I feel it is important to have an area of specialty, however, that doesn't make journalism school irrelevant and no longer needed. There will always be factors that determine what makes things news or what doesn't, society will always have tics and quirks that are worth studying throughout the media. Saying that you only need to be privy to one specialty says that anyone could become a journalist, very similar to citizen journalism. However, with such a broad spectrum of what can make one a journalist or set them apart from one another, subject matters would become over crowded, although in some ways competition may be increased.
It is also brings up the issue of standard journalistic practices and other terms that are thrown around in courts quite frequently. How would one necessarily know or be aware of something (as basic as it may be) as journalistic practices? One cannot be a lawyer without a law degree, yet journalism is much different? Perhaps I am more critical because of my current status as a student of journalism, however, there are many things that if one did not study journalism, they would have to teach themselves on their own, while they can already become an expert in any given area simply by reading much about it; there isn't necessarily much education needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment